Archive for December, 2011

Top Small Business Stories

The biggest small business stories of 2011

Bill O’Leary/WASHINGTON POST – Businesses owners faced a littany of challenges in 2011, but they also scored several victories in the nation’s capital.

, Published: December 30

Sadly, headlines coming out of the nation’s capital this year were inundated with words like gridlock, bickering and failure. Partisan rancor and economic uncertainty spawned a super flop by the supercommittee, a prolonged payroll tax debacle, and on more than one occasion, the near collapse of the federal government.

Still, there were moments to celebrate for entrepreneurs, as policy makers overturned burdensome healthcare reform measures, rescued a pair of small business research programs, and repealed burdensome regulations on federal contractors. The Small Business Administration even managed to set new lending records, and several arms of the government launched new programs to support and encourage entre­pre­neur­ship.

So before setting our sights squarely on 2012, we took a final look back at the year’s biggest small business stories coming out of Washington. Here are the top 11 for 2011.

11. Chamber opens entrepreneurship center: While commonly known as big businesses’ biggest advocate, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce announced plans to start a Center for Entrepreneurship back in February. The center later drafted an advisory council made up of entrepreneurs and plans to sponsor lobbying efforts on behalf of new and young companies. In the years ahead, the group also hopes to spur immigration reform that will make it easier for students from foreign countries to launch firms in the United States.

10. Payroll tax squabble prolonged: Lawmakers, lobbyists and the president spent the last month of the year battling over the extension of a payroll tax cut, which was set to expire at the end of 2011, potentially raising taxes for 160 million American workers. Democrats and Republicans eventually agreed on a two-month extension with plans to hash out a yearlong deal in January. However, the absence of a long-term extension and lingering disagreements over how to pay for the tax cut have left small business owners heading into the new year with a newfound level of uncertainty about potential tax rates.

9. Fed extends low interest rates: In response to unexpectedly slow economic growth, the Federal Reserve in August promised to maintain near-zero federal interest rates through at least the middle of 2013, ensuring that cheap borrowing rates would be available to those seeking loans in the coming years. The declaration of a specific time frame was an unusual move for the Fed, which tends to stick to more ambiguous terms like “extended period” in order to allow for flexibility as the economy ebbs and flows.

8. SBA breaks loan record: The Small Business Administration approved a record-high $30.5 billion in loans in fiscal 2011, evidence that employers are seeking capital to expand their businesses and increase hiring. The tally broke the previous record of $28.5 billion set in 2007 (before lending froze during the recession) and easily eclipses last year’s mark of $22.6 billion. However, the total number of loans increased only marginally from 60,771 in 2010 to 61,689 in 2011.

7. White House launches Startup America: On the heels of his State of the Union address, President Obama announced the formation of Startup America, a broad public-private program designed to encourage entrepreneurship and promote the interests of high-growth start-ups in the United States. The initiative is backed by companies like IBM and Intel Capital and headed by Steve Case, co-founder of AOL and chief executive of Revolution LLC. The group later added the likes of Michael Dell, Reed Hastings, Tory Burch and Magic Johnson to its board of directors.

6. House passes crowdfunding proposals: The House of Representatives in early November easily passed the Entrepreneurs Access to Capital Act, which would alter SEC rules to allow young companies to seek funding through online portals. The Senate is also considering two separate yet similar crowdfunding bills, and the president has expressed support for the proposals. The House also passed the Access to Capital for Job Creators Act in November, which would eliminate some of the SEC rules prohibiting the general solicitation of funding, setting the stage for further debate on the Hill in early 2012.

5. Fed settles on swipe fee limits: The Federal Reserve in June approved a roughly 24-cent limit on the fee debit-card providers can charge vendors for each card transaction. While the cap landed at about half of the current average of 44 cents per swipe, retailers large and small had expected a much lower limit after the board originally proposed a 12-cent cap back in December 2010. Moreover, the structure of the cap (a number of pennies rather than a percentage) left some small-ticket vendors paying even higher swipe fees after the rule was implemented in October.

4. Small business research programs reauthorized: After three years of short-term extensions, lawmakers in December agreed to reauthorize and expand the Small Business Innovation Research program and the Small Business Technology Transfer program, which require government agencies to set aside some of their annual research budgets for contracts and grants to small businesses. The compromise extended the programs for six more years, increased the small business allocation requirements and allowed venture-backed firms to compete for grants through the programs.

3. Withholding tax thrown out: In November, the president signed legislation overturning an earlier measure that would have required federal, state and local governments to withhold 3 percent of payments to contractors until they paid their federal taxes. President George W. Bush approved the original measure five years ago, but officials delayed implementation following heavy criticism from contractors and business groups across the country. The repeal also marked the first piece of Obama’s jobs plan to pass into law.

2 . Patent system overhauled: The president this fall signed the America Invents Act, radically altering the United States patent system for the first time in more than half century. The law moved the country from a first-to-invent to a first-to-file patent system, limiting expensive legal battles over patent rights and aligning the nation’s system with that of most other nations, helping American innovators protect their intellectual property in foreign courts.

1. Healthcare paperwork requirement abolished: Business owners around the country breathed a collective sigh of relief in April when lawmakers repealed a provision of the health care reform law that would have drastically expanded the 1099 information filing requirements. Under the proposed rule, companies would have been required to submit forms to the Internal Revenue Service any time they spent more than $600 a year with another business, meaning potentially hundreds of burdensome forms for firms that currently file only a handful of 1099’s each year.

LinkedIn Community Recommends ISO 9000

Readers Respond: What Quality System Software Would You Recommend if Starting a Company’s Quality Manual from Scratch?

December 19, 2011

Members of Quality Magazine’s LinkedIn Group offer up their own answers to this question. Do you have a response? Share your comment today.

Mark Snively, quality control manager at The Champion Co., asked members of Quality Magazine’s LinkedIn group what quality system software they would recommend if starting a company’s quality manual from scratch. Here were what some members had to say:

Jeff Pfouts, quality assurance at McAfee Tool & Die Inc.: “You might want to define what you have in mind. The size of the company; what resources you have such as IT personnel; computers; networks— what you wish to accomplish and of course the budget.

I personally have not worked with quality systems software, as I have worked at small companies with limited resources and budgets. Our solutions are homegrown with the MS series, though I am not above even going cheaper than that and working with one of the free office suites out there.”

William West, PhD, board of directors at Western Textiles: “You will have to layout your expectations much like any other project. From there you can begin to define what costs you are willing to bear and what the time line is. There are many good systems out there, but without a well defined plan, you may purchase software that looks good but may not meet your expectations later.”

Bob Doering, quality engineering professional; expert in CorrectSPC for Precision Machining: “For a quality manual, I would use MS Word. If you are looking for a canned manual, I really do not have a recommendation for that. For most industries that has been passé”. As far as an overall quality system software, my favorite over all of the ones I have used is still MQ1 from Cebos (Cebos.com)”

Tom Arneson, CQA, president at Focus Consulting LLC: “I would suggest you look at Mike Mickelwright’s book, Lean ISO 9000. I have used the suggested two-page quality manual with my last two ISO certification audits. I agree with Bob: stick with the MS products and keep it simple.”

Douglas H. Hoover, principal optical engineer at Reichert, Inc. : “From scratch. The key is to keep it simple (as noted by those posting above). I would recommend contacting a consultant well versed in ISO 9000, 13845 and the entire FDA(Good Manufacturing Procedures (GMP) process. Then I would insist on the absolute minimum page count in a quality manual and reward for brevity and simplicity.

You probably don’t want a one-size-fits-all software package. If you want electronic records, a database system and office software (MS or others) should suffice. You can omit quite a lot of the regulatory based requirements for medical devices, but I believe that the basic framework in ISO will be a good choice for a quality management system over the long haul. If you need sophistication over time, it’s easy to add, but start with a complicated system and it will haunt you forever. Make sure that any consultant you contact knows that you want a bare bones system and never pay by the page.”

Ken Bunselmeyer, quality director at AG Industries: “ I totally agree with Douglas. Keep it as simple as possible. If you use a consultant, get examples of their documentation. Some just keep piling on more and more documents like band aids. I’d love to see Tom’s two-page quality manual.”

Edison Reis, oil sands quality and compliance manager at SGS Canada Inc.: “Mark, you already received several good suggestions, but as mentioned before, keep the quality manual very simple and focus on providing more details on tier two and three documents, procedures and work instructions respectively.

Strive to have a 15–20 page quality manual, which should suffice to give you a good outline about what does your company do and who the company is. Everything else can be addressed on tier two and three docs.

Michael McMonagle, quality manager at OYO Geospace: “I’m in agreement with Tom. Take a look at Micklewright’s book on lean ISO. It’s a radical approach that makes perfect sense once you digest it. I recently attended an ASQ seminar with Mike, and we are now looking to use his approach in our revamping of our existing QMS and Tier two procedures.

The ASQ Web site has a short one hour webinar with Mike discussing Lean ISO, and his book (hard copy or ebook) is available at a discount to ASQ members.”

Ronald Barr, vice president of quality at Transphorm: “[It] definitely depends on the size of the company, and if you are going to ISO9001 or something else, [and] your budget.

I am currently working on my second “greenfield” ISO9001 implementation, and have also done a greenfield 14001, and so share your pain. I’ve used template files in the past as a starting point. You might Jack Kanholm’s book and his materials. A simple database program to help to track your QMS can be very helpful, and is better than using spreadsheets. I started our ISO program using ISOxpress and their materials to get things going (this is also published by Kanholm) They have the templates and their program is pretty good. It’s been updated since I used it last about a year ago.

Later we migrated to an integrated system, EtQ and expect to go for registration in the near future using it as the platform for our QMS. A fully-integrated system requires some upfront costs but is much easier to deal with in the long run. [It] depends on your requirements and resources.

Consultants are a two-edged sword. You can turn the entire program over to a consultant, but then need to make sure that the consultant’s system is going to fit your company’s needs, culture and budget. My own approach has been to generate the system as best as I can and then use consultants to audit, critique, and as general sounding board to bounce ideas off of. I then plan on a couple of internal audits to work out the bugs before going for registration. As long as you are OK with your consultant telling you that your work isn’t worth spit and working with them to fix it, this is the way to go. At least it has worked for me the last two times, and seems to be working on my third.”

Stephen Cummings, high-tech sales and marketing executive: “It sounds like your company is just starting out with quality and is still small. Another approach for starting out quickly but with a good foundation for the longer term is to look into a commercially available online solution. This would get you more than just the quality manual, but you’ll need more soon enough. A hosted solution means you can start with a few users; not worry about having to run a server yourself; and capture the benefits of a structured and integrated, computer-based QMS. As a vendor, I help companies deal with this issue all the time. But I’d recommend you consider this approach, even if you don’t go with us!”

Willy Grunfeld, owner and principal consultant at TQAS, quality manager at Shafir Production Systems: “I suppose you mean QMS support software, and if that is the case, it has very little relationship with the status of the quality manual.

“The most important feature to look at in a QMS support software is what effort does it take to integrate it with other company-wide software like ERP, CRM, PDM, etc. The best software is worthless if it doesn’t exchange data with these other programs. As for writing/maintaining the quality manual and quality procedures, I agree that MS Office or equivalent is all that’s needed. In a very large company with over 20-30 procedures, a document management system would make life easier.”

FIJI NU Goes ISO 9000

Part of FNU becomes ISO 9000 certified
Publish date/time: 28/12/2011 [17:01]
Part of Fiji National University has become ISO 9000 certified.

This certification standard of the International Organization for Standardization means the university has achieved some globally accepted standards of managing an organization.

FNU Director Division of TVET, Jone Usamate said the University has implemented a comprehensive Customer Complaint management system and a systematic online method of capturing staff suggestions for improvements.

He added that a Quality Committee of ISO Champions drawn from all the departments and sections of the university has been formed to spearhead the relevant processes so the university can get to the level of certification.

Over a million organizations worldwide are independently certified, making ISO 9001 one of the most widely used management tools in the world today.

Story by: William Waqavakatoga

Obama Pleads His Case

Obama makes his case for second term on ’60 Minutes’

Obama on "60 Minutes"President Obama speaks with CBS’ Steve Kroft in Osawatomie, Kan. (CBS)
By Michael A. MemoliDecember 11, 2011, 4:01 p.m.

His approval ratings are largely stagnant and his prospects for reelection in doubt. But President Obama says it’s all to be expected.

“We’ve gone through an incredibly difficult time in this country. And I would be surprised if the American people felt satisfied right now,” Obama told CBS’ Steve Kroft in an interview to air on “60 Minutes” on Sunday. “They shouldn’t feel satisfied. We’ve got a lot more work to do in order to get this country and the economy moving in a way that benefits everybody, as opposed to just a few.”

Put another way, Obama said he compared himself with a ship captain in stormy waters.

“No matter how well we’re steering the ship, if the boat’s rocking back and forth and people are getting sick and, you know, they’re being buffeted by the winds and the rain … if you’re asking, ‘Are you enjoying the ride right now?’ folks are  going to say, ‘No.’ ” Obama said. “People are  going to say, ‘You know what? A good captain would have had us in some smooth waters and sunny skies at this point.’ And I don’t control the weather.”

Kroft interviewed the president twice last week, first after a speech in Osawatomie, Kan., that was viewed as laying the groundwork for his reelection campaign. Obama spoke about the growing income inequality in America, and called it a “make-or-break moment” for the middle class.

Kroft noted the criticism that Obama is engaging in class warfare and calling for a “redistribution of wealth.”

“The problem is, is that our politics has gotten to the point where we can’t have an honest conversation about the greatest income inequality since the 1920s, and we can’t have an honest conversation about the irresponsibility that resulted in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, without somebody saying that somehow we’re being divisive,” Obama said. “No, we’re being honest about what happened, and we’ve got to be honest about how we move forward.”

A CBS/New York Times poll released this weekend found that 54% of Americans think Obama doesn’t deserve another term. Kroft asked Obama to make his case.

He rattled off a familiar list of accomplishments, starting with “saving this country from a Great Depression” and rescuing the auto industry. There’s also healthcare reform, financial reforms, ending “don’t ask, don’t tell” and “decimating” Al Qaeda, including the death of Osama bin Laden.

“But you know, but when it comes to the economy, we’ve got a lot more work to do. And we’re, we’re  going to keep on at it.”

The president also quoted his vice president in describing why he’s not worried about poll numbers at this point.

“I’m being judged against the ideal. And, you know, Joe Biden has a good expression. He says, ‘Don’t judge me against the Almighty, judge me against the alternative.’ ”

Asked about the Republican race, Obama said it wouldn’t matter who the nominee was because all were expressing the same core philosophy. He thinks Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich “will be going at it for a while.” Gingrich has “been around a long time,” and as for Romney: He’s “shown himself to be somebody who’s good at politics, as well. He’s had a lot of practice at it.”

The interview closes with Kroft recalling the speech Obama gave announcing his candidacy, and asking him whether he promised more than he could deliver.

“I didn’t overpromise. And I didn’t underestimate how tough this was going to be,” he said. “It was  going to take more than a year. It was going to take more than two years. It was going to take more than one term. Probably takes more than one president. The one thing I’ve prided myself on before I was president, and it turns out that continues to be true as president: I’m a persistent son of a gun.”

Obama talks re-election

Obama beseeches supporters to stick with him

By KEN THOMAS, Associated Press – 4 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Imploring supporters to stick with him, President Barack Obama acknowledged Tuesday that his re-election is not “a slam dunk” because of understandable public skepticism over the economy but said his campaign would put forward a vision aligned with the mood of the country.

The president, addressing donors at a hotel near the White House, drew attention to his efforts to heal the economy, end the Iraq war and overhaul health care but said “all those things don’t mean that much to somebody if they’re still out of work right now or their house is still underwater by $100,000. So, yeah, this is going to be tough.”

“We’re going to have to fight for it. It’s not going to be a slam dunk,” he said. Obama said the campaign would pursue “the vision that is truest to our history and most representative of the core decency of the American people.”

Obama spoke hours after his top campaign advisers said they were uncertain about which Republican will emerge to challenge him next year but predicted a long GOP primary contest that they say will produce a weaker opponent in 2012.

Democrats have been targeting former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney as the most likely GOP nominee but noted that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s surge in the polls has made the Republican contest very unpredictable.

Obama campaign officials said during a briefing in Washington that they expected a lengthy primary contest that would eventually hurt the party’s nominee. They noted that only 15 percent of Republican convention delegates will be awarded by the end of February, making it likely that the contest will continue well into the spring.

“They’re being tugged to the right every day. I think they’re mortgaging themselves for the general by tacking as far as they are,” Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod said of the Republican candidates. He said that would make it more difficult for the nominee “to scramble back” to the center and appeal to a broader base of the electorate for the November general election.

Axelrod likened Gingrich’s rise to a common quip in Chicago politics: “The higher the monkey climbs on the pole, the more you can see his butt.” Reacting to the $10,000 bet Romney offered Texas Gov. Rick Perry during last Saturday’s debate in Iowa, Axelrod said, “Generally his practices have been to bet other people’s money, not his own.”

Republicans said Obama and his advisers keep talking about his “vision” for the country but that all he has offered are empty promises.

“After three years of Obama, Americans want results – not more of his vision that has lost jobs and created record deficits,” said Kirsten Kukowski, a Republican National Committee spokeswoman. “Americans know the truth: This president is full of empty promises and has taken our country in the wrong direction, which is why the Obama’s job approval continues to slump in battleground states across the country.”

Romney and Gingrich remain locked in a close contest in early Republican voting states like Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina with less than a month before voters begin assessing the GOP field. The Republican field repeatedly has blamed Obama for the nation’s economic woes and said his policies have failed to jumpstart the economy.

Obama campaign officials said the president’s speech last week in Kansas offered a glimpse of what his message will be next year: His argument that the middle class has faced numerous challenges during the past decade and that the country’s economic policies must give everyone a “fair shot and a fair share.”

Obama made that case again in his remarks to donors, telling them “we’re all in this together.”

“That vision can contrast to a vision that basically says you are on your own,” he said. “It’s what this election was about in 2008; it’s what this election is going to be about in 2012.”

The campaign officials also claimed an organizational advantage over the GOP. They said they have more staff on the ground in Iowa than the Republicans and have had about 1 million conversations with supporters and about 90,000 in-person meetings with volunteers since Obama launched his re-election campaign in April.

Obama’s campaign outlined several potential paths to victory that would build upon states that Democrat John Kerry won in 2004 and winning in Western states like Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada or holding onto Southern states Obama captured in 2008, such as Virginia and North Carolina.

Obama’s session with top campaign donors came ahead of the Dec. 31 deadline for the current fundraising quarter. Obama has raised more than $150 million for his campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the end of September.

Obama’s $200 billion stimulus plan irks Republicans

Obama raises stakes over $200bn stimulus renewal

By James Politi and Richard McGregor in Washington

The White House has raised the stakes in increasingly fraught negotiations over a $200bn stimulus package for the US economy, angering Republicans by linking the measures to separate legislation to keep the government funded for the next nine months.

The move by Barack Obama, president, marks a high-risk attempt to corral Republicans into a compromise in Washington’s end-of-year fiscal warfare, since it increases the odds that some federal agencies could shut down as early as Saturday.

More

The White House has been pressing Congress for months to pass an extension of payroll tax cuts and emergency jobless benefits that are due to expire at the end of the month, on the grounds that if they lapsed it would do serious damage to the US economy.

Republicans have accepted the need to preserve these forms of stimulus in 2012. But the bill they approved in the House of Representatives on Tuesday night by a 234 to 193 margin does so in a way that the White House and many congressional Democrats reject. It pays for the measures by curbing the pay of federal workers, rather than imposing higher taxes on wealthy Americans as Democrats want. It also includes several other provisions – primarily an expedited approval process for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline project as well as certain reforms to the jobless benefit scheme – that Democrats are opposed to.

From the White House’s perspective, the danger was that House Republicans would try to “jam” the Senate by leaving for the holidays after passage of their payroll tax cut bill. In holding up the separate legislation to fund the government through September 30 2012 – negotiated by senior lawmakers from both parties over the past several weeks – the White House is trying to keep Republicans in town for further negotiations on the stimulus that could lead to a more palatable result.

“Our view is that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed,” a senior administration official said, adding that it was “preposterous” to claim that there wasn’t enough time to have everything wrapped up before the Republicans and Democrats struggle to agree on a deal to cut government spending as the US deficit soars to $15,000bn

The White House has indicated that if a deal on payroll tax cuts cannot be achieved by Friday, lawmakers should pass a new stopgap measure giving them one more week to reach a compromise. “There is no reason for the government to shut down, but there is also no excuse for Congress to leave on vacation until the American people know we have done their business,” the official said.

Mr Obama urged Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader, not to let the spending bill advance until a deal was done on payroll tax cuts in a conversation over the weekend. Republicans reacted with disdain. “If Senator Reid wants to hold up the jobs bill then he will go on Santa’s naughty list,” said Jeb Hensarling, a member of the Republican leadership in the House on Tuesday.

Mitt vs Newt & the Other Republicans

Top Moments From Republican Debate in Iowa

Published December 11, 2011

Fox News Latino

  • GOP Debate Iowa.jpg

    Republican presidential candidates, from left, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, and Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn, stand together prior to their Republican debate, Saturday, Dec. 10, 2011, in Des Moines, Iowa. Newt Gingrich has leapfrogged Mitt Romney to become the GOP front-runner and is the expected prime target for his rivals at their latest presidential debate less than a month before the leadoff vote to determine President Barack Obama’s challenger. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

Newt Gingrich defended himself against attacks from Texas Rep. Ron Paul and Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann as well as Mitt Romney, the former front-runner, in the first debate since he soared to the lead in polls nationally and in Iowa. The state’s caucuses on Jan. 3 will kick off the competition for Republican National Convention delegates who will pick an opponent to President Barack Obama.

All six Republicans on stage assailed Obama’s handling of the economy, the overriding issue of the election, yet split down the middle on legislation making its way toward a year-end vote in Congress to extend a Social Security payroll tax cut into 2012.

Here were some of the biggest moments of the night.

What’s $10,000 among friends?

Mitt Romney challenged Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s claims that the former Massachusetts governor backed a requirement that individuals purchase health care coverage.

“I’m just saying, you’re for individual mandates, my friend,” Perry told Romney during Saturday evening’s debate, returning to a criticism that has dogged Romney’s campaign.

“You’ve raised that before, Rick, and you’re simply wrong,” Romney responded, extending his hand toward Perry. “Rick, I’ll tell you what, 10,000 bucks?”

It was a rich bet that perhaps reminded some voters that Romney has a fat enough bank account to make such wagers. But Perry wasn’t playing.

“I’m not in the betting business,” he said.

Romney’s rivals seized on it. Democrats were giddy about the moment, which they planned to use to cast Romney as an elitist who could afford such lavish bets.

And aides to GOP hopeful Jon Huntsman — himself, the son of a famously wealthy family — announced they planned to criticize Romney on a website: www.10KBet.com.

Romney: Football Dreams Dashed

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich also took on Romney, saying the only reason he wasn’t a lifelong politician is because he came up short in his first campaign.

“Let’s be candid: The only reason you didn’t become a career politician is because you lost to Teddy Kennedy in 1994,” Gingrich said to Romney.

“Now wait a second,” Romney said.

“I’m just saying,” Gingrich replied.

“It’s a bit much: You’d have been a 17-year career politician by now if you’d won. That’s all I’m saying on that one,” Gingrich continued.

Romney lost his first campaign and returned to the private sector, where he made millions as a venture capitalist, and rescued 2002′s Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City.

Romney, however, conceded Gingrich’s suggestion — to a point.

“That’s probably true,” Romney said. “If I’d have been able to get in the NFL as I had hoped I could as a kid, why, I would’ve been a football star all my life, too.”

Gingrich on Marital Infidelity: I’m a Grandfather Now

Gingrich also faced tough questions, including about his three marriages — including to wife, Callista, with whom he carried on an extramarital affair while still wed to wife No. 2.

“I think it is a real issue. I think people have to look at the person to whom they are going to loan the presidency,” Gingrich said, while Callista Gingrich sat in the audience. “And they have the right to ask every single question.”

Gingrich has previously acknowledged infidelity.

“I’ve made mistakes at times. I’ve had to go to God for forgiveness. I’ve had to seek reconciliation,” he said Saturday evening. “But I’m also a 68-year-old grandfather and I think people have to measure who I am now and whether I’m a person they can trust.”

Bachmann Keeps 9-9-9 Alive

Rep. Michele Bachmann was the first — and last candidate — on stage to bring up Herman Cain, who recently left the presidential race amid repeated accusations of sexual harassment and an extramarital affair.

It was likely part of a plan to lure some of Cain’s supporters her way.

“One of our former competitors was Herman Cain, and he was always reminding us of the 9-9-9 plan,” Bachmann said early on. “And what I’d like to do is the win, win, win plan.”

She later praised Cain’s contribution to the presidential race while answering her final question of the night.

Gingrich Defends ‘Invented’ Palestinians

Gingrich insisted that an interview where he called Palestinians “invented” was not a mistake. Romney said Gingrich was undermining Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu.

Gingrich insisted he was factually accurate when he said Palestinians were part of anti-Israel propaganda and that they were historically Arabs.

“Is what I said factually true? Yes,” Gingrich said.

“I spoke as a historian,” he said later.

“That was a mistake, on the speaker’s part,” Romney said of the interview with The Jewish Channel.

“The United States should not jump ahead of Bibi Netanyahu and say something that makes it more difficult for him to do his job,” he added.

Other Key Moments

— Bachmann tried to link Romney with Gingrich — and paint both as unacceptable to conservatives on issues such as climate change and health care mandates. During one exchange, she branded the pair as “Newt Romney.”

— Sen. Rick Santorum compared his record with Bachmann’s — noting that he, too, fought as a member of the then-minority Republican caucus. His difference: He was able to win political fights, while Bachmann has come up short on her signature issues such as stopping Democrats’ health care overhaul.

— Rep. Ron Paul took pride in often being the lone voice in Congress against legislation. “I end up sometimes, believe it or not, voting all by myself, thinking why aren’t there people paying attention?” the Texan said.

— Huntsman was the evening’s missing man. He did not meet the polling threshold to participate and instead campaigned in New Hampshire, a state he is making central to his strategy.

House Passes Extension of Cut to Payroll Taxes

House Passes Extension of Cut to Payroll Taxes

Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

The passing of the tax cut extension was a victory for the House speaker, John A. Boehner, left, at the Capitol before the vote.

By ROBERT PEAR and JENNIFER STEINHAUER
Published: December 13, 2011

WASHINGTON — Defying a veto threat from President Obama, the House on Tuesday passed a bill extending a cut in Social Security payroll taxes for 160 million Americans for another year. But the Democratic majority in the Senate vowed to reject the measure because of objections to other provisions, including one to speed construction of an oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast.

Multimedia
Graphic
House Vote 923 — Extends Payroll Tax Cut

A one-stop destination for the latest political news — from The Times and other top sources. Plus opinion, polls, campaign data and video.

The 234-to-193 vote set the stage for negotiations between the House and the Senate likely to continue into the weekend.

The vote was a victory for Speaker John A. Boehner. House Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the bill, forcing Mr. Boehner to rely on Republicans, including many conservatives who had initially expressed doubts about the economic value of extending the payroll tax cut.

In general, the vote followed party lines. Ten Democrats voted for the bill, and 14 Republicans voted against it.

The payroll tax bill, portrayed by House Republican leaders as an engine of job creation, became entangled Tuesday with a separate omnibus spending bill to finance much of the government for the remainder of the current fiscal year.

Democrats threatened to delay action on the spending bill to ensure that Republicans would address their concerns about the Keystone XL pipeline and other provisions of the payroll tax measure.

The pileup of important legislation created a typical end-of-the-year muddle as lawmakers raced to finish work and leave town for the holidays.

Members of both parties said the payroll tax cut would put money in the pockets of consumers, increasing the demand for goods and services and shoring up a weak economy.

The bill would extend jobless benefits for some of the unemployed, while reducing the maximum number of weeks of benefits that a worker could receive.

It would also block certain air pollution rules for industrial boilers and incinerators; freeze the pay of many federal employees through 2013; increase Medicare premiums for affluent beneficiaries; prevent a deep cut in Medicare payments to doctors; and eliminate more than $20 billion of spending planned under Mr. Obama’s new health care law.

Representative David Dreier, Republican of California, said the bill deserved bipartisan support because the pipeline “will create 20,000 to 25,000 jobs immediately and reduce dependence on Middle Eastern oil while increasing cooperation with our close neighbor to the north, Canada.”

But Representative Jim McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts, said the bill was “loaded up with goodies to mollify the extreme right wing that is in charge of this House.” And the No. 2 House Democrat, Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, urged members of his caucus to vote no.

“This is a partisan bill sticking a finger in the eye of those who disagree with the policies included, simply for the purpose of energizing a small political base in their party,” Mr. Hoyer said.

Republicans “included things that clearly are unacceptable to the president,” like the pipeline, Mr. Hoyer said. “They know this is not going to pass the Senate.”

Mr. Boehner and the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said House and Senate negotiators had nearly reached agreement on the omnibus spending bill. But, they said, the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, was holding it up.

“The Senate majority leader now says he’s willing to hold up a bipartisan bill to fund our troops, border security and other federal responsibilities, rather than let the president decide if this pipeline project should move forward,” Mr. McConnell said.

Senator Reid defended his tactics, saying: “I am very disappointed in what the speaker has done to his payroll tax proposal to get Tea Party votes. Speaker Boehner had to add ideological candy coating to his bill to get rebellious rank-and-file Republicans on board.”

Mr. Reid said House Republicans were “wasting time catering to the Tea Party when they should be working with Democrats on a bipartisan package.”

“Speaker Boehner can’t pass anything in the House without Democratic votes, because anything you pass with strictly Republican votes fails over here,” Mr. Reid said. “In the Senate, we can’t pass anything unless we get Republican votes. It’s a fact of life.”

Mr. Obama said last week that he would reject any effort to tie the oil pipeline to the payroll tax cut. In its veto threat on Tuesday, the White House complained that House Republicans were protecting tax breaks for the wealthy and injecting “ideological issues into what should be a simple debate about cutting taxes for the middle class.”

The House debate highlighted stark differences on jobless benefits. Republicans would reduce the maximum duration of benefits to 59 weeks, from the current 99. Representative Earl Blumenauer, Democrat of Oregon, said it was cruel to reduce the limit because, in many parts of the country, “the jobs aren’t there.”

But Representative Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, said 59 weeks reflected “the more normal level typically available following recessions.”

Mr. Camp hailed several other restrictions and requirements.

Under the bill, states could require drug testing of people who applied for jobless benefits. And most people receiving benefits would have to search for work and to pursue education credentials if they did not have high school diplomas.

The House Republican bills lists the oil pipeline and the rollback of environmental rules as “job creation incentives.”

But Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, said the Republicans were giving gifts to “their planet-polluting patrons, Big Oil and Big Coal,” and he asserted: “G.O.P. used to stand for Grand Old Party. Now it stands for Gang of Polluters. Now it stands for Gas and Oil Party.”

Some labor unions and some Democratic lawmakers support the pipeline project.

“I support the pipeline, but I also respect the president’s views that he does not want to be pushed into a decision,” said Senator Mary L. Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana. “So I haven’t made a final decision.”

Obama’s Re-Election First Ads

Obama re-election campaign releases its first ads, seeking volunteers for the long road ahead

By Associated Press, Published: November 29

Ken Thomas

WASHINGTON — With an eye on recruiting volunteers, President Barack Obama is launching the first TV ads of his re-election campaign.

Campaign officials said Tuesday the ad buy is “tiny” on national satellite TV stations but aimed at learning whether television is a good way to find volunteers. In the two 30-second ads, Obama urges viewers to call a number on the screen or visit the website www.JoinObama.com , which invites people to enter their email address and zip code to become involved with the campaign.

“The 2012 campaign is under way and the outcome will depend not on what I do, but what you do,” Obama says in one of the ads.

Obama’s campaign has placed a premium on building a large network of volunteers and the ads are aimed squarely at that effort. By placing them on satellite TV in small increments, the campaign can test how well they help to recruit people to join neighborhood campaign teams, knock on doors and register new voters.

“They can go in a targeted way, see where it hits, see how effective it is and work out the kinks,” said Democratic strategist Tad Devine, who is not affiliated with the campaign.

For Obama, who became politically active as a community organizer in Chicago during the mid-1980s, the first ads remind viewers of his “change” message in 2008 and underscore his campaign’s strategy of building a large organization next year to compensate for his weakened standing and voters’ unhappiness with the direction of the country.

“It all starts with you making a decision to get involved because we’ve got so much more to do,” Obama says.

Republicans said the ads showed Obama was struggling to generate the enthusiasm he had during the 2008 campaign. “By acknowledging that the 2012 campaign is in full swing, it’s clear everything Obama does for the next year is about saving his job,” said Kirsten Kukowski, speaking for the Republican National Committee.

Obama’s campaign has held thousands of events around the nation to jumpstart participation, including neighborhood gatherings, one-on-one meetings in coffeehouses, phone banks and voter registration drives. His team is also trying to organize many of the voters who formed the foundation of Obama’s coalition in 2008 — black and Latino voters, women, college students and young voters entering the work force.

Improving Producer-Supplier Relations With ISO 9000

Legal Insight: Legal Relationships

by Bryan L. Berson
December 1, 2011

“Point 4 – End the practice of awarding business on the basis of price tag alone. Instead, minimize total cost by working with a single supplier.” – W. E. Deming

Quality can be defined as “fitness for use.” As members of a supply chain, manufacturers and service providers use materials from suppliers to create products for their users. Each party must receive a product that is fit for use so that it can be processed and meet the next user’s needs. This month’s column focuses on the legal relationship between producers and their external suppliers.

When production is understood as a process, it seems obvious that members of the supply chain should communicate to understand each other’s needs. Within an organization, management can implement policies that facilitate interaction among departments and personnel. The relationship between a producer and an external supplier is governed by contract law.

Contract negotiation can be adversarial or collaborative. Adversarial parties take self-serving positions. They might focus on extracting maximum price concessions. A shortsighted focus on purchase price ignores the total cost of production. A party who simply chooses the lowest priced supplier may ignore costly alterations further down the supply chain. A different grade of supplies may require modifications and result in critical quality changes that increase the costs of poor quality, such as warranty costs. Thus, focusing on obtaining the lowest price alone can reduce quality, erode profits and destroy goodwill.

Collaborative parties think of each other as partners pursuing a mutual goal or solving a common problem. Internal customers, purchasing personnel and suppliers communicate. They view production and improvement as continuous processes, not a series of unrelated transactions. While each input may not have been obtained at the absolute lowest price, a strong relationship with a dependable supplier that values efficiency, loyalty and cost reduction can provide greater certainty and higher quality.

Not all managers, personnel and legal counsel will subscribe to this cooperative approach. Over time, however, producers with a cooperative mindset will likely discover that most production inputs come from a “vital few” suppliers with whom they can establish their most productive relationships.

The nature of the producer-supplier relationship will influence their contract. At the outset of their relationship, even the most honorable parties must develop trust and evaluate the prospects for their long-term compatibility. Early on, the parties will likely have a more formal, less collaborative relationship. As trust grows, the parties will likely streamline the contract negotiations and simplify the legal documentation.

Written contracts and related documentation are business tools that can facilitate a business relationship. A producer and supplier can use a contract to:

  • establish teams to discuss their needs.
  • specify performance metrics and means for collecting and measuring data.
  • agree on minimum performance standards relating to defects and delivery.
  • specify the process for taking corrective action.

To choose and maintain relationships with suppliers, producers must evaluate suppliers’ performance including their quality system, business health and product quality.

Before contracting, parties usually conduct due diligence. A producer may audit a supplier’s plant to certify the quality system. A contract may identify the certification standard—for example, ISO 9000—that the supplier must maintain. Producers with sufficient leverage may require that the supplier adhere to certain covenants or contractual promises to ensure that they maintain their financial health (for example, a limited level of debt), production capacity and technological expertise.

A long, formal contract filled with incentives for good performance and penalties for bad performance won’t help an honest party if the counterparty is untrustworthy. If you sense that the other party is dishonest, undependable or argumentative, find a more amicable business partner. By avoiding or ending bad relationships, you can focus on productive ones. Keep searching until you find them.

 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »